Structuralism perspective in science and technology Essay

Structuralism perspective in science and technology - Essay ExampleHowever, it was the work of Ferdinand de Saussure that is generally considered to be a startle point of the 20th century structuralism (Structuralism, 2006). Amongst the well-kn protest structuralists argon Ferdinand de Saussure, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan, and Lvi-Strauss. However, it is not possible to claim that about important social and/or psychological theoreticians and certain sciences are structuralist in character because what they do is to piss models of psychological or social reality (Glazer, 1996). Throughout the 1940s and 1950s, existentialism like that practiced by Jean-Paul Sartre was the prevailing mood. Structuralism only became prominent in France after WWII predominantly in the 1960s. The early attractor of structuralism in France led it to spread throughout the world (Structuralism, 2006). By the early 1960s, structuralism, as a movement, was able to stand on its own and of fered a unified approach to benevolent life that will hug all crystallizes (Structuralism, 2006).Just like any other heathen movement, the influences and developments of structuralism are motley (Structuralism, 2006). Structuralism is contentious and indefinable concept. Generally, structuralism can be understood in two levels first, as a wide intellectual movement, one of the most noteworthy ways of theorising in the human sciences in the twentieth century second, as a specific set of approaches to literature (and other arts and aspects of culture) prosperous in France during the 1960s however with older roots and continuing repercussions. The basic principle of structuralism is that human activity and its results, even perception and thought itself, are constructed and not natural (Maley, n.d.). The theoretical approach offered by structuralism emphasises that elements of culture must be understood in terms of their relationship to the entire remains (Rubel and Rosman, 1996) . This notion, that the whole is bigger than the parts, got the attention of the Gestalt school of psychology. Fundamentally, the elements of culture are not descriptive in and of themselves, that they form part of a significant system. Structuralism, as an analytical model, assumes the universality of human thought processes in the aim to understand the deep structure or underlying connotation that exist in cultural phenomena (Lett, 1987 Meyer, n.d.). However, the most complicated characteristic of structuralism is that these structures are not based on concrete or physical phenomena as they are in biological or other sciences but based on cultural realities such kinship organisation or stories. These cultural realities are mental as are the structures which explain them. These structures and their structuralist models exist only in human minds, and not in nature as e.g. a Marxist would claim (Glazer, 1996). Structuralism is a multifacet approach embraced by a variety of academic discipline such as psychology, linguistics, anthropology, and human culture as well. Structuralism in psychology In the nineteenth century, structuralism existed for the first time in academic psychology. Psychology, as a subject of discussion, also has a long history within the fields of philosophy and physiology. It only became a sovereign field of its own with the work of the German Wilhelm Wundt. . He was the first one in