Sunday, February 10, 2019

Media and Violence Essay -- Social Issues, Aggression

IntroductionIn this essay I volition be analysing whether little visual violence within the media would mean less(prenominal) violence on the streets. Firstly, I leave alvirtuoso be questioning whether thither is a connection between the viewing of media violence and featual playacting upon it. To do this I allow for disassemble the usefulness of the incompatible methods apply to approach such as complex issue. To illustrate this I go forth use examples of different media forms that seem to have been a catalyst for acts of violence. I will then attempt to come to a conclusion on whether less media violence could mean less acts of violence. DefineFirstly, to begin to analyse the media effects of violence one must define the term violence. The circumstance that in that respect atomic number 18 several different levels of violence means that it will be difficult to define (Gauntlett, 2001). For example using abusive lecture support been seen as an act of violent and aggre ssion to some, but to others may not view it as actual violence as there has not been any form of physical contact. A researcher will also have to look at the context in which the act of violence is acted upon, for example a pillow fight and punching some are both forms of aggression, yet they are interpreted differently (Boyle, 2005). One guidance violence can be defined is an act when an individual advisedly uses aggressive behaviour physically or mentally to creates fear and suffering upon others. The media usually displays most acts of violence using a variety of mediums and different forms. In the 21st century there has been a technology blare whereby new and more complexes forms of media have emerged. There has been an increase in immersion and interaction amongst mediums such as the video game, television and mobile phones. For example, by usin... ...luencing criminal offence such as gross structural inequality, poverty, consumer culture and juvenility lunacy (Gaunt lett, 2001). To pin point the media as the root cause of streets law-breaking prevents society from dealing with the real issue. To conclude, even if the media had stopped or throttle crime being presented, crime would still exist in one form or another. The media is a powerful to for creating aware of crimes but can also cause ir thinking(prenominal) fear which could then lead to alienation of a particular group. It could then be questioned if the media should limit the amount of crime shown, however in this post modern era technology has turn so advanced that visual crime will always be accessible. Therefore, it cannot be said that less crime in the media would mean less crime on the street as there is no rational link between the two and visual crime will always be present.

No comments:

Post a Comment